Petković, I. – оригиналан научни рад – ЕКОМ 2025

WELLBEING AND HR BENEFITS AS DETERMINANTS OF PERCEIVED VALUE AND COMPANIES’ WILLINGNESS TO INVEST IN EMPLOYEES’ ONLINE EDUCATION

WELLBEING И HR БЕНЕФИТИ КАО ДЕТЕРМИНАНТЕ ПЕРЦЕПЦИЈЕ ВРЕДНОСТИ И СПРЕМНОСТИ КОМПАНИЈА ДА ИНВЕСТИРАЈУ У ОНЛАЈН ЕДУКАЦИЈУ ЗАПОСЛЕНИХ

pp. / стр. 199-218

Ивана Петковић

Академија струковних студија Јужна Србија, Одсек Висока пословна школа Лесковац, Република Србија

ABSTRACT:

The study investigates how wellbeing and human resource (HR) benefits affect the perceived value (PERVAL) and companies’ willingness to pay (WTP) for employees’ online education, with special attention to the mediating role of digital customer experience (DCX) and personalization. The research draws on data collected from 3,454 respondents (HR managers, executives, and employees) and applies structural equation modeling (SEM) to test the proposed relationships. The results confirm that HR benefits and wellbeing policies significantly enhance perceived value, which in turn increases firms’ readiness to invest in online learning. Moreover, digital customer experience and personalization further strengthen this relationship by creating more engaging and adaptive learning environments. The findings provide actionable insights for HR managers and decision-makers seeking to integrate wellbeing and learning benefits into strategic human capital development.

САЖЕТАК:

Ова студија истражује на који начин добробит запослених и бенефити из области управљања људским ресурсима (HR) утичу на перципирану вредност (PERVAL) и спремност компанија да плате (WTP) за онлајн образовање запослених, са посебним освртом на посредујућу улогу дигиталног корисничког искуства (DCX) и персонализације. Истраживање се заснива на подацима прикупљеним од 3.454 испитаника (HR менаџера, руководилаца и запослених) и користи структурно моделовање једначина (SEM) за тестирање постављених односа. Резултати потврђују да HR бенефити и политике добробити значајно унапређују перципирану вредност, што даље повећава спремност компанија да инвестирају у онлајн учење. Поред тога, дигитално корисничко искуство и персонализација додатно јачају овај однос креирајући ангажујуће и прилагодљиве образовне средине. Налази пружају практичне смернице HR менаџерима и доносиоцима одлука за интеграцију програма добробити и учења у стратегије развоја људског капитала.

Keywords:

wellbeing, HR benefits, perceived value (PERVAL), digital customer experience (DCX), personalization, willingness to pay (WTP).

Кључне речи:

добробит, HR бенефити, перципирана вредност (PERVAL), дигитално корисничко искуство (DCX), персонализација, спремност за плаћање (WTP).

REFERENCES / ЛИТЕРАТУРА:

  • Becker, G. S. (1993). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education (3rd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
  • Bleier, A., & Eisenbeiss, M. (2015). Personalized online advertising effectiveness: The interplay of what, when, and where. Marketing Science, 34(5), 669–688. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2015.0929
  • Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (3rd ed.). Routledge.
  • Chen, K., & Wang, J. (2019). Determinants of consumers’ willingness to pay for online education: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 11(13), 3583. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133583
  • Fan, H., & Poole, M. S. (2006). What is personalization? Perspectives on the design and implementation of personalization in information systems. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 16(3–4), 179–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/10919392.2006.9681199
  • Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Ufer, S., Sodian, B., Hussmann, H., Pekrun, R., & Eberle, J. (2020). Scientific reasoning and argumentation in digital learning environments. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 90. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00090
  • Gorbatov, S., Khapova, S. N., & Lysova, E. I. (2021). Personal branding: Interdisciplinary systematic review and research agenda. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 652. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.633
  • Grawitch, M. J., Gottschalk, M., & Munz, D. C. (2006). The path to a healthy workplace: A critical review linking healthy workplace practices, employee well-being, and organizational improvements. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 58(3), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1037/1065-9293.58.3.129
  • Guest, D. E. (2017). Human resource management and employee well-being: Towards a new analytic framework. Human Resource Management Journal, 27(1), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12139
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
  • Hanemann, W. M. (1991). Willingness to pay and willingness to accept: How much can they differ? The American Economic Review, 81(3), 635–647.
  • Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2021). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE Review, 56(4), 12–26.
  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
  • Kotler, Ph., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing management (15th ed.). Pearson Education.
  • Kumar, V. (2018). Transformative marketing: The next 20 years. Journal of Marketing, 82(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.82.41
  • Lemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. (2016). Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey. Journal of Marketing, 80(6), 69–96. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0420
  • Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Bakia, M. (2020). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 122(1), 1–64.
  • Mićić, I. (2023). The role of digital personalization in improving perceived value in online education. Ekonomika, 69(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.5937/ekonomika2301045M
  • Petković, I. (2024). Adaptation of the Digital Customer Experience Scale (DCX) to measure student experience in online education. Manuscript in preparation.
  • Punniyamoorthy, M., & Raj, P. M. (2007). An empirical model for consumer perception of value. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 15(4), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jt.5750041
  • Rizomyliotis, I., Konstantoulaki, K., & Kostopoulos, I. (2018). Digital transformation and customer experience in the education sector. International Journal of Educational Management, 32(5), 931–946. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-05-2017-0138
  • Rose, S., Clark, M., Samouel, P., & Hair, N. (2012). Online customer experience in e-retailing: An empirical model of antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Retailing, 88(2), 308–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2012.03.001
  • Sweeney, J. C., & Soutar, G. N. (2001). Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. Journal of Retailing, 77(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00041-0
  • Williams, P., & Soutar, G. N. (2009). Value, satisfaction and behavioral intentions in an adventure tourism context. Annals of Tourism Research, 36(3), 413–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2009.02.002
  • Xu, H., Teo, H. H., Tan, B. C., & Agarwal, R. (2020). The role of personalization in enhancing user engagement with digital platforms: A systematic review. Information Systems Research, 31(2), 253–272. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2020.0933
  • Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means–end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298805200302